首页> 外文OA文献 >Post-BEPS Tax Advisory and Tax Structuring from a Tax Practitioner’s View
【2h】

Post-BEPS Tax Advisory and Tax Structuring from a Tax Practitioner’s View

机译:从税务从业者的角度来看BEPS后的税收咨询和税收结构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

textabstractThe international tax landscape is changing and it is changing fast. The political perception is that taxation of multinational enterprises is not aligned with the ‘economic activity’ that produces their profits (i.e. not aligned with ‘value creation’). The perception links ‘value creation’ with ‘employees and sales’.\udIn the BEPS Project of the OECD, the OECD attempts to combat base erosion and profit shifting and to align taxation with value creation. In this article, the authors discuss the impact they expect BEPS to have on tax advisory and tax planning. The focus goes to BEPS Actions 7, 8-10 and 13. By maintaining the separate entity approach under BEPS for the taxation of multinationals, has the OECD been forced to ‘stretch’ existing rules beyond their limits? Will the created uncertainty lead to a shift from ‘aggressive tax planning’ by multinationals to ‘aggressive tax collection’ by tax administrations? Will the role of tax advisory change from advising on the lowest possible effective tax rate to a broader advice including risk appetite and public expectations?
机译:国际税收形势正在发生变化,并且变化迅速。政治上的看法是,跨国公司的税收与产生利润的“经济活动”不符(即与“价值创造”不符)。这种观念将“价值创造”与“员工和销售”联系起来。\ ud在经合组织的BEPS项目中,经合组织试图打击基础侵蚀和利润转移,并使税收与价值创造保持一致。在本文中,作者讨论了他们期望BEPS对税收咨询和税收筹划的影响。重点放在BEPS行动7、8-10和13。通过在BEPS下维持对跨国公司征税的单独实体方法,经合组织是否被迫“扩展”现有规则,超越其限制?所产生的不确定性是否会导致跨国公司从“激进税收计划”转变为税收征管机构的“激进税收”?税务咨询的作用会从建议尽可能低的有效税率变为更广泛的建议,包括风险偏好和公众期望?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号